Quality of author guidelines of journals in the biomedical and physical sciences
International journals solicit submissions from authors all over the world. But are these journals’ author guidelines clear enough for nonnative English speakers?
This examine is the recipient of the Best Poster Award (Council of Science Editors’ 2013 Annual Conference) and has been published in Learned Publishing. Its authors discuss quantitatively the completeness and clarity of author guidelines of international English-language journals in the biomedical and physical sciences.
To assess quantitatively the completeness and clarity of author guidelines of international English-language journals in the biomedical and physical sciences, we randomly sampled 80 journals for which author guidelines were available online in English. The guidelines were reviewed for completeness and clarity in addressing ‘aims and scope,’ ‘submission and post-submission processes,’ ‘formatting instructions,’ ‘ethical requirements,’ and ‘authorship,’ and were subjectively assessed as being finish (score, 1) or incomplete (0), and clear (1) or unclear (0). Scores were represented as mean percentages. No journal scored 100% for completeness and clarity. ‘Formatting instructions’ was the most finish and clear category, and ‘authorship,’ the least finish and clear category. Biomedical science journals were more accomplish and clear in all categories, except ‘authorship,’ compared to physical science journals. While author guidelines of many English-language journals of biomedical and physical sciences adequately address some essential aspects, they presently do not provide all necessary information as clearly as possible.
Remya Nambiar, Priyanka Tilak, and Clarinda Cerejo. “Quality of author guidelines of journals in the biomedical and physical sciences.” Learned Publishing 27 no. Three (2014)
View the total preprint article
Quality of author guidelines.pdf